Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

The Post Office v. Portec, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, 89-1034 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 89-1034 Visitors: 101
Filed: Jul. 02, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 935 F.2d 1105 19 U.S.P.Q.2d 1399 THE POST OFFICE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PORTEC, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 88-2836, 89-1034. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 29, 1991. Order on Reconsideration July 2, 1991. Before McKAY, ANDERSON, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 42(b) and the stipulation submitted by the parties, this appeal is dismissed as moot. Our opinion filed August 27, 1990, 913 F.2d 802 (10th Cir.) is vacated an
More

935 F.2d 1105

19 U.S.P.Q.2d 1399

THE POST OFFICE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PORTEC, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 88-2836, 89-1034.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

May 29, 1991.
Order on Reconsideration July 2, 1991.

Before McKAY, ANDERSON, and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 42(b) and the stipulation submitted by the parties, this appeal is dismissed as moot. Our opinion filed August 27, 1990, 913 F.2d 802 (10th Cir.) is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss the complaint. Great Western Sugar Company v. Nelson, 442 U.S. 92, 93-94, 99 S. Ct. 2149, 2149-50, 60 L. Ed. 2d 735 (1979); United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 39, 71 S. Ct. 104, 1106, 95 L. Ed. 36 (1950).

2

A certified copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court.

ORDER

Filed July 2, 1991

3

Pursuant to the parties' Stipulated Motion for Reconsideration, the Order of this court filed May 29, 1991, is hereby withdrawn; and the following order is entered in lieu thereof.

4

Our opinion filed August 27, 1990, is vacated. By stipulation of the parties, this appeal is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs.

5

A certified copy of this order shall stand as and for the revised mandate of the court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer