U.S. v. MITCHELL, 3:14cr306-MHT. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150522711
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 21, 2015
Latest Update: May 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the representations made in open court on May 20, 2015, it is ORDERED that defendant John W. Mitchell's fourth motion in limine (doc. no. 88), regarding whether defendant John W. Mitchell performed more stent procedures than other physicians did, is granted. Before the court will allow the government to introduce evidence of how many stent procedures defendant John W. Mitchell performed compared with how many stent procedures other doctors
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON , District Judge . Based on the representations made in open court on May 20, 2015, it is ORDERED that defendant John W. Mitchell's fourth motion in limine (doc. no. 88), regarding whether defendant John W. Mitchell performed more stent procedures than other physicians did, is granted. Before the court will allow the government to introduce evidence of how many stent procedures defendant John W. Mitchell performed compared with how many stent procedures other doctors ..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Based on the representations made in open court on May 20, 2015, it is ORDERED that defendant John W. Mitchell's fourth motion in limine (doc. no. 88), regarding whether defendant John W. Mitchell performed more stent procedures than other physicians did, is granted. Before the court will allow the government to introduce evidence of how many stent procedures defendant John W. Mitchell performed compared with how many stent procedures other doctors performed, the government must show why mere volumes (as opposed, for example, to comparative rates) are relevant.
Source: Leagle
