Gordon v. Daniels, 2:16cv209-WHA. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20180228999
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2018
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . On February 1, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 15) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 15) is ADOPTED; (2) Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. # 1) is DENIED; and (3) This action is DISMISSED w
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . On February 1, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 15) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 15) is ADOPTED; (2) Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 (Doc. # 1) is DENIED; and (3) This action is DISMISSED wi..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
On February 1, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 15) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 15) is ADOPTED;
(2) Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. # 1) is DENIED; and
(3) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice, as the petition presents no basis for federal habeas corpus relief, and even if the petition raises constitutional claims cognizable in an action for federal habeas corpus relief, the petition is time-barred under the one-year limitation period in 28 USC § 2244(d).
A separate final judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
