Robinson v. Tuck, 2:19-CV-850-WHA. (2020)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20200108580
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2020
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . On December 10, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #12) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to provide a current address as ordered by this court. A separate Final Judgment
Summary: ORDER W. HAROLD ALBRITTON , Senior District Judge . On December 10, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #12) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to provide a current address as ordered by this court. A separate Final Judgment w..
More
ORDER
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, Senior District Judge.
On December 10, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #12) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to provide a current address as ordered by this court.
A separate Final Judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
