HAFEEZ v. HOLDER, 4:15-cv-342-RDP-TMP. (2015)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20150630b83
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 29, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR , District Judge . On June 8, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 be denied and dismissed as moot. (Doc. 13). No objections have been filed. Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the Report is due to be and h
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION R. DAVID PROCTOR , District Judge . On June 8, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 be denied and dismissed as moot. (Doc. 13). No objections have been filed. Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the Report is due to be and he..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
R. DAVID PROCTOR, District Judge.
On June 8, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation, recommending that this petition for habeas corpus relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be denied and dismissed as moot. (Doc. 13). No objections have been filed. Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the Report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Consequently, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be denied and dismissed with prejudice as moot. A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
