United States v. Moore, 2:19-cr-40-KOB-JEO. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20191223742
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 37) that the court deny Defendant Hannibal Ukorkaroy Moore's motion to suppress (doc. 29). Mr. Moore filed objections (doc. 38) and the magistrate judge held an evidentiary hearing on December 20, 2019. In that hearing, after discussions with the defendant and his counsel, the magistrate judge construed Mr. Moore's objections (doc. 38),
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 37) that the court deny Defendant Hannibal Ukorkaroy Moore's motion to suppress (doc. 29). Mr. Moore filed objections (doc. 38) and the magistrate judge held an evidentiary hearing on December 20, 2019. In that hearing, after discussions with the defendant and his counsel, the magistrate judge construed Mr. Moore's objections (doc. 38), a..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KARON OWEN BOWDRE, Chief District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 37) that the court deny Defendant Hannibal Ukorkaroy Moore's motion to suppress (doc. 29). Mr. Moore filed objections (doc. 38) and the magistrate judge held an evidentiary hearing on December 20, 2019. In that hearing, after discussions with the defendant and his counsel, the magistrate judge construed Mr. Moore's objections (doc. 38), as a Motion for New Counsel, to which the court orally granted. New counsel for the defendant will be assigned by separate order.
The court considered the entire record in this case de novo, including the report and recommendation, the motion to suppress and supporting brief (doc. 29 & 36), the government's responses (docs. 32 & 35), and the transcript of the suppression hearing (doc. 34). The court finds that it should ACCEPT the magistrate judge's report and ADOPT his recommendation to DENY the motion to suppress.
The court will enter a separate Order doing so.
DONE and ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
