Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cowart v. U.S., 14-00037-KD-N-1. (2016)

Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama Number: infdco20160518724 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE , District Judge . After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 123 1 ) of the Magistrate Judge dated March 28, 2016, and made under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitione
More

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 1231) of the Magistrate Judge dated March 28, 2016, and made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)-(C), Rule 8(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts, and S.D. Ala. GenLR 72(a)(2)(R), is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner William Shane Cowart's operative Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 120) is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice, that his initial § 2255 motion (Doc. 118) is MOOT, and that Cowart is not entitled either to a Certificate of Appealability or to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. All "Doc." citations herein refer to the docket of the above-styled criminal action.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer