U.S. v. Villanueva-Castaneda, 18-00321-KD-MU. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20190212612
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY INTERPRETER UTILIZED P. BRADLEY MURRAY , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, Israel Villanueva-Castaneda, by consent, has appeared before the undersigned pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count(s) One of the Indictment charging a violation of Reentry of a Removed Alien. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rul
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY INTERPRETER UTILIZED P. BRADLEY MURRAY , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, Israel Villanueva-Castaneda, by consent, has appeared before the undersigned pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count(s) One of the Indictment charging a violation of Reentry of a Removed Alien. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY
INTERPRETER UTILIZED
P. BRADLEY MURRAY, Magistrate Judge.
The Defendant, Israel Villanueva-Castaneda, by consent, has appeared before the undersigned pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count(s) One of the Indictment charging a violation of Reentry of a Removed Alien.
After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, the Court determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and the offense(s) charged is supported by an independent basis in fact as to each of the essential elements of such offense. The Court therefore recommends that the plea of guilty be accepted and that Defendant Israel Villanueva-Castaneda be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.
DONE and ORDERED.
NOTICE TO PARTIES
A party has fourteen days from this date to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation's factual findings and legal conclusions. A party's failure to file written objections waives that party's right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R. 3-1.
Source: Leagle
