RICHARD v. HANEY, 1:13-cv-18-DPM-HDY. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20130612774
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2013
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. No one has objected to Magistrate Judge H. David Young's recommendation, N o 19, that the Court dismiss as a defendant "Tina," whom Richard names in his amended complaint, NQ 5, but does not tie to any alleged wrongdoing. On review for legal error and clear factual error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Note), the Court adopts Judge Young's recommendation. The Clerk is directed to terminate the Jane Doe "Tina" as a p
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge. No one has objected to Magistrate Judge H. David Young's recommendation, N o 19, that the Court dismiss as a defendant "Tina," whom Richard names in his amended complaint, NQ 5, but does not tie to any alleged wrongdoing. On review for legal error and clear factual error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Note), the Court adopts Judge Young's recommendation. The Clerk is directed to terminate the Jane Doe "Tina" as a pa..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
No one has objected to Magistrate Judge H. David Young's recommendation, No 19, that the Court dismiss as a defendant "Tina," whom Richard names in his amended complaint, NQ 5, but does not tie to any alleged wrongdoing. On review for legal error and clear factual error, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (1983 Addition to Advisory Committee Note), the Court adopts Judge Young's recommendation. The Clerk is directed to terminate the Jane Doe "Tina" as a party defendant.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle