MURPHY v. ROBINS, 1:13CV00123 BSM. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140623661
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, Chief District Judge. The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young and the objections filed by defendants have been reviewed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record in this case, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1.
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, Chief District Judge. The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young and the objections filed by defendants have been reviewed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record in this case, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. D..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, Chief District Judge.
The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young and the objections filed by defendants have been reviewed. After careful consideration and a de novo review of the record in this case, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendants' motions to dismiss [Doc. Nos. 31, 43] are granted in part and denied in part.
2. The motions are granted to the extent that plaintiff's claims for monetary damages against defendants in their official capacities are dismissed with prejudice. The motions are denied in all other respects.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
