Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thompson v. Hobbs, 5:14CV00068 BSM. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20141007a85 Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2014
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge. The recommended disposition filed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe has been reviewed. After careful consideration of the objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety in all respects. Charles Thompson's petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 2] is denied and dismissed with prejudice. When entering a final order adverse to a habeas corpus petitione
More

ORDER

BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.

The recommended disposition filed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe has been reviewed. After careful consideration of the objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety in all respects. Charles Thompson's petition for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. No. 2] is denied and dismissed with prejudice.

When entering a final order adverse to a habeas corpus petitioner, a certificate of appealability must be issued or denied. Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. A certificate of appealability may issue only if a petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2). In this case, there is no basis for this court to issue a certificate of appealability. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer