Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MARTIN v. CORIZON CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, 5:13-cv-00364 KGB/JJV. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20150219786 Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 18, 2015
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge. Before the Court are two Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. Nos. 113, 141). The Court will address each in turn. First, the Court has has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by Magistrate Judge Volpe that relate to plaintiff Lawrence Martin's motion for temporary restraining order and motion for order (Dkt. No. 113). The Court also has reviewed Mr. Martin's obje
More

ORDER

KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.

Before the Court are two Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe (Dkt. Nos. 113, 141). The Court will address each in turn.

First, the Court has has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by Magistrate Judge Volpe that relate to plaintiff Lawrence Martin's motion for temporary restraining order and motion for order (Dkt. No. 113). The Court also has reviewed Mr. Martin's objections to the recommendation (Dkt. No. 117). After careful review of the recommendation, Mr. Martin's objections, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 113). The Court denies Mr. Martin's motion for temporary restraining order and motion for order (Dkt. Nos. 102, 104), and Mr. Martin's change of address is noted (Dkt. No. 102).

Next, the Court has reviewed the second Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by Magistrate Judge Volpe that relate to Mr. Martin's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 141). The Court also has reviewed the objections filed by Mr. Martin to that recommendation (Dkt. No. 143). After careful review of the recommendation, Mr. Martin's objections, and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 141). Mr. Martin's motion for summary judgment is denied (Dkt. No. 130).

The Court denies as moot Mr. Martin's motion for ruling (Dkt. No. 146). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer