JOHNSON v. BAKER, 1:15CV00081 BSM. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20151008744
Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2015
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition ("PRD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff Wilbert Johnson's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the PRD are hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants Faust, Evans, and Griffin are dismissed without prejudice. 2. It is certified, purs
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition ("PRD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff Wilbert Johnson's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the PRD are hereby adopted in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Defendants Faust, Evans, and Griffin are dismissed without prejudice. 2. It is certified, pursu..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The proposed findings and partial recommended disposition ("PRD") submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and plaintiff Wilbert Johnson's objections thereto have been reviewed. After careful consideration of these documents and a de novo review of the record, the PRD are hereby adopted in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. Defendants Faust, Evans, and Griffin are dismissed without prejudice.
2. It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
