Knox v. Richards, 1:15CV00097-JM. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160426896
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMI
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMIS..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
2. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
