THOMAS v. BYRD, 2:15-cv-95-DPM. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160923859
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2016
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr. , District Judge . The unopposed motion, N o 35, is granted as modified. The Final Scheduling Order N o 19, is suspended, but the case is not stayed. We need to keep moving forward. Joint report due by 19 August 2016. The Court needs a copy of the tentative settlement and would appreciate a proposed framework (and timetable) for considering the deal's fairness and adequacy, as well as for implementing it. Please also provide an update on the Sentencing
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, Jr. , District Judge . The unopposed motion, N o 35, is granted as modified. The Final Scheduling Order N o 19, is suspended, but the case is not stayed. We need to keep moving forward. Joint report due by 19 August 2016. The Court needs a copy of the tentative settlement and would appreciate a proposed framework (and timetable) for considering the deal's fairness and adequacy, as well as for implementing it. Please also provide an update on the Sentencing ..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, Jr., District Judge.
The unopposed motion, No 35, is granted as modified. The Final Scheduling Order No 19, is suspended, but the case is not stayed. We need to keep moving forward. Joint report due by 19 August 2016. The Court needs a copy of the tentative settlement and would appreciate a proposed framework (and timetable) for considering the deal's fairness and adequacy, as well as for implementing it. Please also provide an update on the Sentencing Options Solutions issues: Is there a deal on non-class claims? Are any class claims against SOS covered by the parties' proposed settlement?
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
