Filed: Nov. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2017
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de nova review, the Court adopts the recommendation, N o 67, and overrules Grant/Rakim's objections, N o 69 & N o 70. FED. R. CIR. P. 72(b)(3). Giving Grant/Rakim's side of the story about the July 7th examination full weight, Bland was negligent at most, not deliberately indifferent. Bland's motion for summary judgment, N o 62, is granted. The amended complaint, N o 10, will be dismissed with prejudice. So
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de nova review, the Court adopts the recommendation, N o 67, and overrules Grant/Rakim's objections, N o 69 & N o 70. FED. R. CIR. P. 72(b)(3). Giving Grant/Rakim's side of the story about the July 7th examination full weight, Bland was negligent at most, not deliberately indifferent. Bland's motion for summary judgment, N o 62, is granted. The amended complaint, N o 10, will be dismissed with prejudice. So ..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
On de nova review, the Court adopts the recommendation, No 67, and overrules Grant/Rakim's objections, No 69 & No 70. FED. R. CIR. P. 72(b)(3). Giving Grant/Rakim's side of the story about the July 7th examination full weight, Bland was negligent at most, not deliberately indifferent. Bland's motion for summary judgment, No 62, is granted. The amended complaint, No 10, will be dismissed with prejudice.
So Ordered.
