Johnston v. Chaney, 2:17-CV-00060 BSM. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20171129737
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2017
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere [Doc. No. 59] and plaintiff Avery Johnston's objections [Doc. No. 62] have been reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 37] is denied based on the arguments presented in their motion. Nevertheless, Johnston's claims against defendants are dism
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere [Doc. No. 59] and plaintiff Avery Johnston's objections [Doc. No. 62] have been reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 37] is denied based on the arguments presented in their motion. Nevertheless, Johnston's claims against defendants are dismi..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
The recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere [Doc. No. 59] and plaintiff Avery Johnston's objections [Doc. No. 62] have been reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 37] is denied based on the arguments presented in their motion. Nevertheless, Johnston's claims against defendants are dismissed, without prejudice, for Johnston's failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
