Martin v. Elkins, 4:17CV00371-JLH. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20180426869
Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is
Summary: ORDER J. LEON HOLMES , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is G..
More
ORDER
J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Document #25.
2. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice.
3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
Source: Leagle
