Tucker v. Kimble, 3:17-cv-295-DPM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20181010974
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . In response to the Court's Order, N o 16, Tucker now objects to Defendants' discovery requests — in their entirety — as irrelevant. N o 17. The Court reminds Tucker that he must abide by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules. Tucker's objection doesn't comply with Local Rule 33.1(b), a copy of which is attached. It is therefore overruled. The Court again directs Tucker to respond to Defendants' discovery r
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . In response to the Court's Order, N o 16, Tucker now objects to Defendants' discovery requests — in their entirety — as irrelevant. N o 17. The Court reminds Tucker that he must abide by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules. Tucker's objection doesn't comply with Local Rule 33.1(b), a copy of which is attached. It is therefore overruled. The Court again directs Tucker to respond to Defendants' discovery re..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
In response to the Court's Order, No 16, Tucker now objects to Defendants' discovery requests — in their entirety — as irrelevant. No 17. The Court reminds Tucker that he must abide by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules. Tucker's objection doesn't comply with Local Rule 33.1(b), a copy of which is attached. It is therefore overruled. The Court again directs Tucker to respond to Defendants' discovery requests.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
