Cutsinger v. Kelley, 5:18-CV-00304 BSM. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20190426858
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . After de novo review of the record, including Aaron Cutsinger's objections [Doc. No. 18], the findings and recommendation [Doc. No. 17] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris are adopted. Accordingly, Cutsinger's petition is dismissed, all requested relief is denied, and judgment is entered for Kelley. A certificate of appealability is denied, and Cutsinger's motion for reconsideration of the order denying his motion to app
Summary: ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . After de novo review of the record, including Aaron Cutsinger's objections [Doc. No. 18], the findings and recommendation [Doc. No. 17] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris are adopted. Accordingly, Cutsinger's petition is dismissed, all requested relief is denied, and judgment is entered for Kelley. A certificate of appealability is denied, and Cutsinger's motion for reconsideration of the order denying his motion to appo..
More
ORDER
BRIAN S. MILLER, District Judge.
After de novo review of the record, including Aaron Cutsinger's objections [Doc. No. 18], the findings and recommendation [Doc. No. 17] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris are adopted. Accordingly, Cutsinger's petition is dismissed, all requested relief is denied, and judgment is entered for Kelley. A certificate of appealability is denied, and Cutsinger's motion for reconsideration of the order denying his motion to appoint counsel [Doc. No. 15] is denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
