Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Matlock v. Ephlin, 2:18-cv-155-DPM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas Number: infdco20190917833 Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . Defendants have been served and have answered, No. 3, but they didn't sign the stipulated dismissal, No. 13. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Court therefore construes No. 13 as a motion and grants it. F ED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2). The Court will dismiss Matlock's complaint without prejudice. So Ordered.

ORDER

Defendants have been served and have answered, No. 3, but they didn't sign the stipulated dismissal, No. 13. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Court therefore construes No. 13 as a motion and grants it. F ED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2). The Court will dismiss Matlock's complaint without prejudice.

So Ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer