Houston v. Pruitt, 2:18-cv-00162-KGB-JTK. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20200212528
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2020
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Pending before the Court are defendant Cord Hollister's motion for summary judgment and two Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. Nos. 11, 24, 28). No objections have been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the time to file objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and here
Summary: ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Pending before the Court are defendant Cord Hollister's motion for summary judgment and two Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. Nos. 11, 24, 28). No objections have been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the time to file objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereb..
More
ORDER
KRISTINE G. BAKER, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are defendant Cord Hollister's motion for summary judgment and two Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. Nos. 11, 24, 28). No objections have been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the time to file objections has passed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects (Dkt. Nos. 11, 28).
The Court dismisses without prejudice plaintiff Jason L. Houston's claims against defendants Pruitt and Smith for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and dismisses Mr. Houston's retaliation claim against Mr. Hollister (Dkt. No. 11, at 5). The Court also grants Mr. Hollister's motion for summary judgment, concluding that Mr. Houston failed to exhaust his administrative remedies (Dkt. No. 24). Therefore, the Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Houston's remaining claims against Mr. Hollister.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
