Tullos v. Biomet Inc., 4:18-cv-926-DPM (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20200306a16
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2020
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . 1. Hood v. Biomet, No. 4:19-cv-670-DPM and Smith v. Biomet, No. 4:19-cv-672-DPM, are consolidated into the group for all pre-trial proceedings. All filings should be made on the Tullos docket, No. 4:18-cv-926-DPM. 2. The parties' joint motion to amend the scheduling order, Doc. 111, is granted as modified for good cause. The Court appreciates the parties' cooperation in discovery and understands the challenges. The proposed extensions,
Summary: ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . 1. Hood v. Biomet, No. 4:19-cv-670-DPM and Smith v. Biomet, No. 4:19-cv-672-DPM, are consolidated into the group for all pre-trial proceedings. All filings should be made on the Tullos docket, No. 4:18-cv-926-DPM. 2. The parties' joint motion to amend the scheduling order, Doc. 111, is granted as modified for good cause. The Court appreciates the parties' cooperation in discovery and understands the challenges. The proposed extensions, t..
More
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
1. Hood v. Biomet, No. 4:19-cv-670-DPM and Smith v. Biomet, No. 4:19-cv-672-DPM, are consolidated into the group for all pre-trial proceedings. All filings should be made on the Tullos docket, No. 4:18-cv-926-DPM.
2. The parties' joint motion to amend the scheduling order, Doc. 111, is granted as modified for good cause. The Court appreciates the parties' cooperation in discovery and understands the challenges. The proposed extensions, though, compress the motions schedule, and will not give the Court adequate time to prepare for the hearings. The Court will therefore re-set all the remaining deadlines, and the trial dates, to preserve the existing architecture. An Amended Final Scheduling Order will issue.
So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
