U.S. v. ARREDONDO, 07-50038-001. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20140516610
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 15, 2014
Latest Update: May 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge. On this 13th day of May, 2014, there comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) filed in this case on March 10, 2014, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and sh
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge. On this 13th day of May, 2014, there comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) filed in this case on March 10, 2014, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and sho..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, District Judge.
On this 13th day of May, 2014, there comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) filed in this case on March 10, 2014, by the Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Defendant's pro se "Motion Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 36" (Doc. 33) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
