JOHNSON v. DEVLIN, 4:11-cv-04099. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20150728712
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed July 6, 2015, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 83). This lawsuit originally contained multiple defendants. Those defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 29). The Court granted in part and denied in part the motion, dismissing all claims except two individual capacity claims against Defendant Dr. Dev
Summary: ORDER SUSAN O. HICKEY , District Judge . Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed July 6, 2015, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 83). This lawsuit originally contained multiple defendants. Those defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 29). The Court granted in part and denied in part the motion, dismissing all claims except two individual capacity claims against Defendant Dr. Devl..
More
ORDER
SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed July 6, 2015, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 83).
This lawsuit originally contained multiple defendants. Those defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 29). The Court granted in part and denied in part the motion, dismissing all claims except two individual capacity claims against Defendant Dr. Devlin. (ECF No. 58). The Court referred the matter back to Judge Bryant for the consideration of Plaintiff Lonnie Johnson's individual capacity claims against Dr. Devlin for delay of medical care regarding Johnson's blood pressure and denial of medical care regarding Johnson's alleged diabetes. After consideration, Judge Bryant recommends Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29) on these remaining claims be granted.
The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's remaining claims against Dr. Devlin are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
