U.S. v. Noble, 4:04-CR-40016. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Number: infdco20160523580
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 20, 2016
Latest Update: May 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER HARRY F. BARNES , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant Sedrick Noble's Rule 60(b) Motion for Default Judgment Void for Vagueness in Statute. (ECF No. 33). Upon review of the motion, the Court finds that the motion should be docketed as a motion under 18 U.S.C. 2255. The clerk is directed to re-file the motion as one made pursuant to 2255 and terminate the pending Motion for Default Judgment. (ECF No. 33). IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
HARRY F. BARNES, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Sedrick Noble's Rule 60(b) Motion for Default Judgment Void for Vagueness in Statute. (ECF No. 33). Upon review of the motion, the Court finds that the motion should be docketed as a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 2255. The clerk is directed to re-file the motion as one made pursuant to § 2255 and terminate the pending Motion for Default Judgment. (ECF No. 33).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
