SHOUP v. TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, CV 14-778-TUC-JAS (LAB). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20140820b79
Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. SOTO, District Judge. The Court notes that this case was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Bowman, but the parties elected for an assignment to a District Judge. However, after the case was reassigned to District Judge Jorgenson, she referred the case back to Magistrate Judge Bowman (Doc. 7). When this case was reassigned to this Court on 7/22/14 (Doc. 14), the previous referral to Magistrate Bowman remained in effect. Thus, to clear up any potential confusion, the referra
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. SOTO, District Judge. The Court notes that this case was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Bowman, but the parties elected for an assignment to a District Judge. However, after the case was reassigned to District Judge Jorgenson, she referred the case back to Magistrate Judge Bowman (Doc. 7). When this case was reassigned to this Court on 7/22/14 (Doc. 14), the previous referral to Magistrate Bowman remained in effect. Thus, to clear up any potential confusion, the referral..
More
ORDER
JAMES A. SOTO, District Judge.
The Court notes that this case was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Bowman, but the parties elected for an assignment to a District Judge. However, after the case was reassigned to District Judge Jorgenson, she referred the case back to Magistrate Judge Bowman (Doc. 7). When this case was reassigned to this Court on 7/22/14 (Doc. 14), the previous referral to Magistrate Bowman remained in effect. Thus, to clear up any potential confusion, the referral to Magistrate Bowman still remains in this case, the case number should be listed as appears in the caption above, and the parties shall comply with Doc. 11 pertaining to a Joint Report and Conference before Magistrate Judge Bowman.
Source: Leagle
