USA v. Vielmas, CR-17-08046-001-PCT-SPL. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Arizona
Number: infdco20180103611
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. PYLE , Magistrate Judge . The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause hearing was held and the detention hearing was held on the record including a proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant `:'iolated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. PYLE , Magistrate Judge . The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause hearing was held and the detention hearing was held on the record including a proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant `:'iolated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a f..
More
ORDER
CHARLES R. PYLE, Magistrate Judge.
The defendant appeared in court with counsel. The defendant's probable cause hearing was held and the detention hearing was held on the record including a proffer by defense counsel. The Court finds probable cause to believe the defendant `:'iolated the terms of his supervised release as alleged in the petition. The Court further finds, pursuant to Rule 32.1(a)(6), that defendant has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he is not a flight risk or a danger.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall be bound over for further proceedings on the petition to revoke his supervised release.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant is detained as a flight risk and a danger, pending further revocation proceedings.
Source: Leagle
