Englehart v. Raikey, 93-1985 (1994)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 93-1985
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 01, 1994
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: February 28, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 93-1985 WILLIAM F. ENGLEHART, Petitioner, v. PAUL RAIKEY, WARDEN M.C.I. WALPOLE, Respondent. ________ __________________ __________________ Per Curiam.
USCA1 Opinion
February 28, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
___________________
No. 93-1985
WILLIAM F. ENGLEHART,
Petitioner,
v.
PAUL RAIKEY, WARDEN M.C.I. WALPOLE,
Respondent.
__________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
___________________
Before
Torruella, Boudin and Stahl,
Circuit Judges.
______________
___________________
William F. Englehar on brief pro se.
___________________
Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General, and William J.
___________________ ___________
Duensing, Assitant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.
________
__________________
__________________
Per Curiam. For the reasons stated in the memorandum
___________
and order of the United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts, dated May 24, 1993, the judgment
of the court denying the petition for habeas corpus is
affirmed.
________
-2-
Source: CourtListener
