Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ruiz Rivera v. Dept. of Education, 98-1660 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 98-1660 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: INSTITUTO DE EDUCACION UNIVERSAL CORP., ET AL.and Stahl, Circuit Judge. Given that the district court fees already, had been paid and that appellant's motion for in forma pauperis, status did not refer to any appeal, nor was there any, appealable order at that time, the motion was frivolous.
USCA1 Opinion


       [NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit





No. 98-1660

INSTITUTO DE EDUCACION UNIVERSAL CORP., ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, Appellees,

v.

U.S. DEPT. OF EDUCATION, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees,
____________________

ANGEL RUIZ RIVERA,

Plaintiff, Appellant.



APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Jose Antonio Fuste, U.S. District Judge]



Before

Boudin, Circuit Judge,
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Stahl, Circuit Judge.



Angel Ruiz Rivera on brief pro se.
Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Guillermo Gil,
United States Attorney, and Barbara C. Biddle, Attorney, Appellate
Staff, on brief for appellees.




APRIL 21, 1999



Per Curiam. Upon careful review of the record and
the briefs, it clearly appears that this appeal presents no
substantial issue. Given that the district court fees already
had been paid and that appellant's motion for in forma pauperis
status did not refer to any appeal, nor was there any
appealable order at that time, the motion was frivolous. This
appeal is likewise frivolous.
The order is affirmed, and the appeal is dismissed.
See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
















-2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer