Sepulveda v. United States, 98-2065 (1999)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 98-2065
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 22, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: , Edgar Sepulveda on brief pro se. Having carefully reviewed the decision, below in light of the briefs and the record on appeal, we find, no prejudicial error nor abuse of discretion in the district, court's denial of appellant's motion to set aside an earlier, final judgment under Fed.
USCA1 Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 98-2065
EDGAR SEPULVEDA,
Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Respondent, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
[Hon. Shane Devine, Senior District Judge]
Before
Lynch, Circuit Judge,
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge,
and Lipez, Circuit Judge.
Edgar Sepulveda on brief pro se.
Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and Peter E. Papps,
Assistant U.S. Attorney, on Motion for Summary Disposition for
appellee.
June 16, 1999
Per Curiam. Having carefully reviewed the decision
below in light of the briefs and the record on appeal, we find
no prejudicial error nor abuse of discretion in the district
court's denial of appellant's motion to set aside an earlier
final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6).
Affirmed. See Loc. R. 27.1.
Source: CourtListener
