[NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

                 United States Court of Appeals

                     For the First Circuit











No. 99-1150



              JOHN P. CONROY AND PATRICIA E. CONROY,



                     Plaintiffs, Appellants,



                                v.



              FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION;

               LAWRENCE T. GIBBONS; ELLEN GIBBONS,



                      Defendants, Appellees.

                       ____________________



No. 99-1218



              JOHN P. CONROY AND PATRICIA E. CONROY,



                     Plaintiffs, Appellants,



                                v.



   FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, As Receiver of Woburn

                     Five Cents Savings Bank,



                       Defendant, Appellee,

                       ____________________



               LAWRENCE T. GIBBONS; ELLEN GIBBONS,



                Intervenors-Defendants, Appellees.









           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS



        [Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge]









                              Before



                     Torruella, Chief Judge,

                Stahl and Lipez, Circuit Judges.

                                

                                

                                

                                

     

     John P. Conroy and Patricia E. Conroy on brief pro se.

     Ann S. Duross, Assistant Attorney General, Colleen J. Boles,

Senior Counsel, and Daniel Glenn Lonergan, Counsel, on brief for

appellee Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.











January 5, 2000







                                

                                































































     Per Curiam.  We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the

record in these two appeals.  These appeals are the seventh and

eighth appeals by appellants seeking to forestall the completion of

a foreclosure sale that occurred in September 1995.  They are as

meritless as appellants' prior appeals as the arguments presented

are either waived or barred by res judicata.

     In Appeal No. 99-1150, the district court, by memorandum and

order dated December 29, 1998, dismissed appellants' complaint for

lack of jurisdiction.  We summarily affirm essentially for the

reasons stated by the district court in that memorandum and order.

     In Appeal No. 99-1218, the district court, by order dated

December 29, 1998, enforced a January 17, 1996 order directing

appellants to permit access to the property for an appraisal and

inspection.  We summarily affirm essentially for the reasons stated

by the district court in its order of December 29, 1998.  We also

note that we have already reviewed the January 1996 access order,

which we summarily affirmed in Conroy v. FDIC, No. 96-1172 (1st

Cir. Order, June 10, 1996).

     Affirmed.  See Loc. R. 27(c).