Ross v. Framingham, 99-1649 (2000)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 99-1649
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 23, 2000
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals, For the First Circuit APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT , Aaron K. Bikofsky, Philip B. Benjamin and Bikofsky & White, on brief for appellees. submissions and have reviewed the district court and stated in its opinion, Ross v. Framingham School Comm.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 99-1649
GERSHON ROSS; MARLENE W. ROSS; AS GUARDIAN FOR
GERSHON ROSS,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
v.
THE FRAMINGHAM SCHOOL COMMITTEE; TOWN OF
FRAMINGHAM; MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge,
Boudin and Stahl, Circuit Judges.
Marlene W. Ross on brief pro se.
Aaron K. Bikofsky, Philip B. Benjamin and Bikofsky & White
on brief for appellees.
June 23,2000
Per Curiam. We have carefully read the parties'
submissions and have reviewed the district court and
administrative records. Based on our review, we find that
the decision to grant the defendants' motions for summary
judgment was without error. We therefore affirm the
judgement of the district court for essentially the reasons
stated in its opinion, Ross v. Framingham School Comm.,
44
F. Supp. 2d 104 (D. Mass. 1999).
Affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).
Source: CourtListener