Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ruesch v. Dillon, 01-1281 (2002)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 01-1281 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 07, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: WILLIAM P. DILLON, ET AL.Defendants, Appellees.Selya and Lipez, Circuit Judges.Oak-Hee Ruesch on brief pro se.November 7, 2002, Per Curiam.forth in the court's memorandum order of November 15, 2000.why the complaint should not be dismissed.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 01-1281 OAK-HEE RUESCH, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. WILLIAM P. DILLON, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Nancy Gertner, U.S. District Judge] Before Boudin, Chief Judge, Selya and Lipez, Circuit Judges. Oak-Hee Ruesch on brief pro se. November 7, 2002 Per Curiam. We affirm the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's complaint substantially for the reasons set forth in the court's memorandum order of November 15, 2000. Plaintiff's later motion for reconsideration and new pleading did not cure the complaint's defects nor otherwise show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed. Affirmed. -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer