St. Amand v. Eastern Container, 04-1019 (2004)
Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Number: 04-1019
Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 10, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION ET AL.Circuit Judges.A. J. O'Donald, III for appellant., Kevin B. Callanan for appellees.__________, *Of the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation., Per Curiam.summary judgment.district court applied those principles faultlessly.
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 04-1019 J. ROGER ST. AMAND, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER CORPORATION ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Michael A. Ponsor, U.S. District Judge] Before Selya, Dyk* and Howard, Circuit Judges. A. J. O'Donald, III for appellant. Kevin B. Callanan for appellees. August 10, 2004 __________ *Of the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. Per Curiam. We have read the briefs in this case, listened attentively to oral arguments, and reviewed the record with care. We conclude, without serious question, that the district court appropriately granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The material facts are not genuinely in dispute. The legal principles that govern this case are well-settled and the district court applied those principles faultlessly. Consequently, we summarily affirm the judgment below, substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court's bench decision of November 5, 2003, and its subsequent memorandum and order dated November 6, 2003. Affirmed. See 1st Cir. R. 27(c). -2-
Source: CourtListener
