Filed: Jan. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: , at 79 (quoting Wallace, 461 F.3d at 44).Nor can we endorse the summary imposition of, this significant variance without impairing, the 'fairness, integrity, or public reputation, of the judicial proceedings.' Id.
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 14-1402
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
v.
OSVALDO RIVERA-GONZALEZ,
Defendant, Appellant.
ERRATA SHEET
The opinion of this Court issued on January 8, 2016, is
amended as follows:
On page 5, line 21, the sentence
At sentencing, there was also discussion of
whether the federal sentence should be
consecutive or concurrent with any Puerto Rico
sentence.
is changed to read:
At sentencing, there was also discussion of
whether the federal sentence should be
consecutive to, or concurrent with, any Puerto
Rico sentence.
On page 14, line 4 to page 14, line 8, the sentence
Nor can we "endorse the summary imposition of
such a significant prohibition without
impairing the 'fairness, integrity, or public
reputation of the judicial proceedings.'" Id.
at 79 (quoting
Wallace, 461 F.3d at 44).
is changed to read:
Nor can we "endorse the summary imposition" of
this significant variance "without impairing
the 'fairness, integrity, or public reputation
of the judicial proceedings.'" Id. at 79
(quoting
Wallace, 461 F.3d at 44).
