Filed: Aug. 26, 2008
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit August 26, 2008 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 08-4037 (D.C. No. 2:05-CR-00676-DB-1) BENJAMIN ARCHULETA, (D. Utah) Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before KELLY, LUCERO, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges. This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the appeal waiver contained in defendant’s plea agreement
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit August 26, 2008 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 08-4037 (D.C. No. 2:05-CR-00676-DB-1) BENJAMIN ARCHULETA, (D. Utah) Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before KELLY, LUCERO, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges. This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the appeal waiver contained in defendant’s plea agreement...
More
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
August 26, 2008
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 08-4037
(D.C. No. 2:05-CR-00676-DB-1)
BENJAMIN ARCHULETA, (D. Utah)
Defendant-Appellant.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before KELLY, LUCERO, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.
This matter is before the court on the government’s motion to enforce the
appeal waiver contained in defendant’s plea agreement. The motion is filed
pursuant to United States v. Hahn,
359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc).
In response, defendant concedes that the government’s motion is well taken and
that the appeal should be dismissed.
*
This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not
materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2);
10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral
argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the
doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited,
however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and
10th Cir. R. 32.1.
Accordingly, the government’s motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT
PER CURIAM
-2-