Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gerald Eugene Stano, Cross-Appellee v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellant, 88-3375 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 88-3375 Visitors: 34
Filed: Mar. 16, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 897 F.2d 1067 Gerald Eugene STANO, Petitioner-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Richard L. DUGGER, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. No. 88-3375. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 16, 1990. Mark E. Olive, Georgia Resource Center, Inc., Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant, cross-appellee. Margene A. Roper, Belle Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, Fla., for respondent-appellee, cross-appellant. Appeals from the United Sta
More

897 F.2d 1067

Gerald Eugene STANO, Petitioner-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,
v.
Richard L. DUGGER, Secretary, Florida Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

No. 88-3375.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

March 16, 1990.

Mark E. Olive, Georgia Resource Center, Inc., Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant, cross-appellee.

Margene A. Roper, Belle Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, Fla., for respondent-appellee, cross-appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

(Opinion November 17, 1989, 11th Cir., 1989, 889 F.2d 962)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc with oral argument during the week of June 11, 1990. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer