Filed: Dec. 05, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 05, 2007 No. 06-13648 THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK Agency Nos. A96-096-024 A95-886-844 HENRY ALEJANDRO SALINAS MILLAN, Petitioner, versus U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. _ Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ (December 5, 2007) Before DUBINA and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG,* Judge. PER CURIAM: _ *Honorable Richard W. Goldber
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DEC 05, 2007 No. 06-13648 THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK Agency Nos. A96-096-024 A95-886-844 HENRY ALEJANDRO SALINAS MILLAN, Petitioner, versus U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. _ Petition for Review of a Decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ (December 5, 2007) Before DUBINA and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG,* Judge. PER CURIAM: _ *Honorable Richard W. Goldberg..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
DEC 05, 2007
No. 06-13648 THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________ CLERK
Agency Nos. A96-096-024
A95-886-844
HENRY ALEJANDRO SALINAS MILLAN,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
________________________
Petition for Review of a Decision of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
_________________________
(December 5, 2007)
Before DUBINA and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG,* Judge.
PER CURIAM:
_____________________
*Honorable Richard W. Goldberg, United States Court of International Trade Judge, sitting by
designation.
Henry Alejandro Salinas Millan, a citizen of Colombia, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration
Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief
under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (CAT).1
After reviewing the record, reading the parties’ briefs, and having the benefit
of oral argument, we conclude that the record evidence is sufficient to establish
past persecution.
Accordingly, we grant the petition for review and remand this case to the
BIA to further consider the case in light of our recent precedents of Sanchez
Jimenez v. U.S. Att’y Gen.,
492 F.3d 1223 (11th Cir. 2007), and Ruiz v. Gonzales,
479 F.3d 762 (11th Cir. 2007).
PETITION GRANTED.
1
The IJ’s hearing and the BIA’s review addressed the consolidated claims of Millan and
his two cousins. His cousins later sought voluntary dismissal of their petitions and are no longer
part of the case before us.
2