Filed: Sep. 03, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 3, 2009 No. 08-13461 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-80019-CR-KAM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CANDIS WARNER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 3, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Davi
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 3, 2009 No. 08-13461 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-80019-CR-KAM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CANDIS WARNER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 3, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: David..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
SEPTEMBER 3, 2009
No. 08-13461 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-80019-CR-KAM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CANDIS WARNER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(September 3, 2009)
Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
David J. Joffe, appointed counsel for Candis Warner in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Warner’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2