Filed: Jul. 06, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 08-16257 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 6, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-00019-CR-4-SPM-WCS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHAWN FOOTMAN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 6, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert A
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 08-16257 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JULY 6, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-00019-CR-4-SPM-WCS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHAWN FOOTMAN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (July 6, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert A...
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 08-16257 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
JULY 6, 2009
Non-Argument Calendar
THOMAS K. KAHN
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 08-00019-CR-4-SPM-WCS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SHAWN FOOTMAN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(July 6, 2009)
Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert A. Morris, appointed counsel for Shawn Footman in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Footman’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2