Filed: Dec. 17, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Dec. 17, 2009 No. 09-11549 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00112-CR-3-RV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL VASQUEZ-ORTIZ, a.k.a. Arnoldo Escalante, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (December 17, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and ANDERSON, C
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Dec. 17, 2009 No. 09-11549 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D. C. Docket No. 08-00112-CR-3-RV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MANUEL VASQUEZ-ORTIZ, a.k.a. Arnoldo Escalante, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (December 17, 2009) Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Ci..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Dec. 17, 2009
No. 09-11549 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 08-00112-CR-3-RV
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MANUEL VASQUEZ-ORTIZ,
a.k.a. Arnoldo Escalante,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
_________________________
(December 17, 2009)
Before TJOFLAT, BARKETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Manuel Vasquez-Ortiz in this
direct criminal appeal has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant, because, in her opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Vasquez-Ortiz’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2