Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Deshawn Travis Glover, 09-13301 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 09-13301 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 03, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-13301 NOVEMBER 3, 2009 Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN _ CLERK D.C. Docket No. 05-00006-CR-3-RV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DESHAWN TRAVIS GLOVER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 3, 2009) Before CARNES, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER
More
                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT           FILED
                         ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                                             ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                                No. 09-13301                 NOVEMBER 3, 2009
                            Non-Argument Calendar             THOMAS K. KAHN
                          ________________________                CLERK

                      D.C. Docket No. 05-00006-CR-3-RV

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                         Plaintiff-Appellee,

      versus

DESHAWN TRAVIS GLOVER,
                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                       for the Northern District of Florida
                            _________________________
                               (November 3, 2009)

Before CARNES, MARCUS and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for DeShawn Travis Glover in this appeal

from the denial of a motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c),

has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the

district court’s denial of Glover’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer