Filed: Feb. 22, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10995 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 22, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:01-cr-00050-MP-AK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus LEROY DEXTER, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (February 22, 2011) Before WILSON, MARTIN and FAY
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10995 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 22, 2011 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:01-cr-00050-MP-AK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee, versus LEROY DEXTER, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (February 22, 2011) Before WILSON, MARTIN and FAY,..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10995 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar FEBRUARY 22, 2011
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 1:01-cr-00050-MP-AK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LEROY DEXTER,
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(February 22, 2011)
Before WILSON, MARTIN and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Leroy Dexter in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dexter’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2