Filed: Feb. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-12439 FEB 15, 2011 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-00356-WSD-ECS-26 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIO ESCUTIA-VASQUEZ, a.k.a. “Lucas”, a.k.a. FNU LNU #10, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (Feb
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED _ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-12439 FEB 15, 2011 JOHN LEY Non-Argument Calendar CLERK _ D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-00356-WSD-ECS-26 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIO ESCUTIA-VASQUEZ, a.k.a. “Lucas”, a.k.a. FNU LNU #10, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (Febr..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-12439 FEB 15, 2011
JOHN LEY
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:08-cr-00356-WSD-ECS-26
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARIO ESCUTIA-VASQUEZ,
a.k.a. “Lucas”,
a.k.a. FNU LNU #10,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(February 15, 2011)
Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Mario Escutia-Vasquez in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of
arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Escutia-
Vasquez’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2