Filed: Sep. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10343 Date Filed: 09/24/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10343 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00031-RH-WCS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JIMMY D. HOWARD, a.k.a. JD, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 24, 2012)
Summary: Case: 12-10343 Date Filed: 09/24/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10343 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00031-RH-WCS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JIMMY D. HOWARD, a.k.a. JD, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 24, 2012) B..
More
Case: 12-10343 Date Filed: 09/24/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-10343
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:11-cr-00031-RH-WCS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JIMMY D. HOWARD,
a.k.a. JD,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(September 24, 2012)
Before WILSON, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-10343 Date Filed: 09/24/2012 Page: 2 of 2
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Jimmy D. Howard in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Howard’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2