Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Dianne Marie Pettway, 12-12846 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-12846 Visitors: 61
Filed: Sep. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-12846 Date Filed: 09/10/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12846 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00194-KD-B-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DIANNE MARIE PETTWAY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (September 10, 2013) Case: 12-12846 Date Filed: 09/10/2013 Page: 2 of 2 Before DUBINA, MARCUS and HILL, Circu
More
          Case: 12-12846    Date Filed: 09/10/2013   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                   FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                     ________________________

                           No. 12-12846
                       Non-Argument Calendar
                     ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00194-KD-B-2



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                             Plaintiff-Appellee,


                                  versus


DIANNE MARIE PETTWAY,


                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                     ________________________

              Appeal from the United States District Court
                 for the Southern District of Alabama
                     ________________________

                           (September 10, 2013)
              Case: 12-12846     Date Filed: 09/10/2013    Page: 2 of 2


Before DUBINA, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Frederick G. Helmsing, Jr., appointed counsel for Dianne Marie Pettway, in

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of

the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Pettway’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer