Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Kevin Lamont Gourdine, 12-12463 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-12463 Visitors: 137
Filed: May 07, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-12463 Date Filed: 05/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12463 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00001-BAE-GRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus KEVIN LAMONT GOURDINE, a.k.a. Blue, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (May 7, 2014) Before PRYOR, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 12-12463 Da
More
           Case: 12-12463   Date Filed: 05/07/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                     [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 12-12463
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-00001-BAE-GRS-2



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

KEVIN LAMONT GOURDINE,
a.k.a. Blue,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Georgia
                      ________________________

                              (May 7, 2014)

Before PRYOR, MARTIN and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 12-12463     Date Filed: 05/07/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      E. Vaughn Dunnigan, appointed counsel for Kevin Lamont Gourdine in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gourdine’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer