Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Ervin Walker, Jr., 13-13499 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-13499 Visitors: 67
Filed: Nov. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13499 Date Filed: 11/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13499 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00018-BAE-GRS-15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERVIN WALKER, JR., a.k.a. Ed, a.k.a. Fat, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (November 7, 2014) Case: 13-13499 Date Filed: 11/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2 Before HULL, J
More
          Case: 13-13499   Date Filed: 11/07/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                      [DO NOT PUBLISH]




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                            No. 13-13499
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

             D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00018-BAE-GRS-15



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                           Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERVIN WALKER, JR.,
a.k.a. Ed,
a.k.a. Fat,

                                                        Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

              Appeals from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Georgia
                     ________________________

                           (November 7, 2014)
              Case: 13-13499     Date Filed: 11/07/2014   Page: 2 of 2


Before HULL, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Christopher E. Chapman, appointed counsel for Ervin Walker, Jr. in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walker’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer