Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Abdul Jabbar Mack, 13-13765 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-13765 Visitors: 85
Filed: Aug. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13765 Date Filed: 08/15/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13765 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00270-JRH-BKE-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ABDUL JABBAR MACK, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (August 15, 2014) Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Brendan N. Fleming, appoint
More
              Case: 13-13765    Date Filed: 08/15/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 13-13765
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00270-JRH-BKE-2


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

ABDUL JABBAR MACK,


                                                             Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Georgia
                         ________________________

                                (August 15, 2014)

Before WILSON, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Brendan N. Fleming, appointed counsel for Abdul Jabbar Mack, has moved

to withdraw on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 87 S. Ct.
              Case: 13-13765    Date Filed: 08/15/2014   Page: 2 of 2


1396 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, Fleming’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Mack’s sentence and convictions are

AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer